Paperlog

Five-person alpha

Help shape Paperlog.

A focused 15-minute test is more useful than general feedback.

Try these six things

  1. Find a paper by title, DOI, arXiv ID, or OpenReview URL.
  2. Give it a star rating and a short, honest reader note.
  3. Reply to another note or mark it helpful.
  4. Save a paper, make a public list, and add the paper to it.
  5. If you ran code, publish a structured reproducibility report.
  6. Check your profile and notifications on both phone and desktop.

What to notice

Where did you hesitate? What wording felt academic or intimidating? What would make you return next week? Screenshots and the exact paper URL are especially helpful.

Please do not enter confidential peer-review material.

Use only comments and links you are permitted to share publicly. Paperlog is an independent alpha, not a venue’s official review system.

Send alpha feedback

Operator checklist

  • Invite five people from different roles or seniority levels.
  • Ask each person to use a different paper and one overlapping paper.
  • Review reports, metadata corrections, and contact requests in the admin console.
  • Export a JSON backup after the session.
  • Fix blocking problems before inviting the next group.